Carolo Diodato.

JAm istuc demum plane video te agere, ut obstinato silentio nos aliquando pervincas; quod si ita est, euge habe tibi istam gloriolam, en scribimus priores: quanquam certe si unquam hæc res in contentionem veniret, cur neuter alteri οὕτω διά χρόνου scripserit, cave putes quin sim ego multis partibus excusatior futurus: δηλον ‘οτι ὡς βραδ`ης κα`ι οκνηρός τις ὤν φύσει πρός τ`ο γράφειν, ut probi nôsti, cum tu contra sive naturâ, sive consuetudine, ad hujusmodi Literarias προσφωνήσεις haud ægre perduci soleas. Simul & illud pro me facit, quod tuam studendi rationem ita institutam cognovi, ut crebro interspires, ad amicos visas, multa scribas, nonnunquam iter facias; meum sic est ingenium, nulla ut mora, nulla quies, nulla ferme illius rei cura, aut cogitatio distineat, quoad pervadam quo feror, & grandem aliquam studiorum meorum quasi periodum consiciam. Atque hinc omnino, nec aliunde, sodes, est factum, uti ad officia quidem ultro deferenda spissius accedam, ad respondendum tamen, O noster Theodote non sum adeo cessator; neque enim commisi ut tuam Epistolam unquam ullam debitâ vice nostra alia ne clauserit. Quid! quod tu, ut audio, Literas ad Bibliopolam, ad Fratrem etiam sæpiuscule; quorum utervis propter vicinitatem satis commode præstitisset, mihi, si quæ essent, reddendas. Illud vero queror, te, cum esses pollicitus ad nos fore ut diverteres cum ex urbe discederes, promissis non stetisse; quæ promissa abs te præterita si vel semel cogitasses, non desuisset prope necessarium scribendi argumentum. Atque hæc habui quæ in te merito, ut mihi videor, declamitarem. Tu quæ ad hæc contra parabis ipse videris. Verum interim quid est quæso? recténe vales? ecquinam iis in locis erudituli sunt quibuscum libenter esse, & garrire possis, ut nos consuevimus? quando redis? quamdiu tibi in animo est apud istos ‘υπερβορε´ιους commorari? tu velim ad hæc mihi singula respondeas: sed enim ne nescias non nunc demum res tuæ cordi mihi sunt, nam sic habeto me ineunte autumno ex itinere ad fratrem tuum eo consilio deflexisse, ut quid ageres, scirem. Nuper etiam cum mihi temere Londini perlatum esset à nescio quo te in urbe esse, confestim & quasi αὐτοβοε`ι proripui me ad cellam tuam, at illud σκ´ιας ὄναρ, nusquam enim compares. Quare quod sine tuo incommodo fiat, advola ocyus & aliquo in loco te siste, qui locus mitiorem spem præbeat, posse quoquo modo fieri ut aliquoties inter nos saltem visamus, quod utinam nobis non aliter esses vicinus, rusticanus atque es urbicus, ἀλλ`α το˜υτο ὥσπερ θε˜ω φίλον. Plura vellem & de nobis, & de studiis nostris, sed mallem coram; & jam cras sumus rus illud nostrum redituri, urgetque iter, ut vix hæc propere in chartam conjecerim. Vale.

Londino, Septemb. 2. 1637.

To Charles Diodati.

At last I see what you are driving at—to get the better of me by obstinate silence. If so, very well, enjoy your little triumph; I am the first to write, as you see. All the same, if ever the question arises between us why neither has written to the other for so long, you may well find that I have far the better excuse. For I am by nature backward and slow to write, as you well know, while you, on the contrary, are always ready, either by nature or by habit, to engage in epistolary conversation of this kind. This too is on my side, that your method of study is, as I know, such as to allow of frequent breathing-spaces, visits to friends, a good deal of writing and not infrequent journeys; while my own disposition is such that no delay, no rest, no thought or care for anything else, can divert me from my purpose, until I reach my goal and complete some great cycle of my studies. This is the one and only reason, I beg you to believe, why I am reluctant to enter into any voluntary engagements; but I am not so dilatory in replying to favors received, my good Diodati; and I have never failed to repay any letter of yours by one of mine when it was due.

What am I to say of your having written to your bookseller, and frequently to your brother, as I hear? Either of these, as they live so near, would readily have undertaken to forward letters to me, had there been any.

But my chief complaint is that you broke the promise you made to pay me a visit on leaving town. If you had even once thought of your failure to carry out this promise you would have had an excellent reason for writing.

These are grounds enough, I think, for a formal accusation against you; the defense is your affair.

But meanwhile, what is the cause of your silence? Are you in good health? Are there any budding scholars in your part of the world whose society and talk you can enjoy as we used to do each other's? When do you return? How long do you intend to stay among those Hyperboreans? Please answer each one of my questions; but be sure that the interest I take in your affairs is nothing new, for you must know that early in the autumn, when I was on a journey, I went out of my way to see your brother, on purpose to find out how you were. Besides, not long ago, happening to hear in London from someone or other that you were in town, I rushed off post-haste, and, as I might say, as if by storm, to your lodgings; but it was all "the dream of a shade," for you were nowhere to be found. Therefore, if you can conveniently do so, come quickly, and settle in some place which may at least give better hope of our being able to pay occasional visits to each other: I only wish you could be as near a neighbour to us in the country as you are in town—but be that as God wills.

I have much more to say to you about myself and about my studies, but would rather tell you in person; and tomorrow I am due to return to my country home, and I am on the point of starting for the journey, so that I have barely time to scribble this note to you. Farewell.

London, September 2nd, 1637.

Translation by Phyllis B. Tillyard